> -----Original Message----- > From: David Cramer [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, 2011 December 14 22:45 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [docbook] DTD for DocBook? > > On 12/14/2011 10:53 AM, Norman Walsh wrote: > > Getting a reasonable XSD for DocBook V5.x is a step closer to a > > DTD, but it's not a DTD. Does anyone care? > > > > I doubt it. The use case for alternative schemas is in-editor > validation, right? AFAIK, all the editors that don't support RelaxNG > do support XSD: > > oXygen: RelaxNG, XSD, DTD > XMLMind: RelaxNG, XSD, DTD > emacs+nxml: RelaxNG > XMetaL: XSD, DTD > Serna: XSD > Epic: ???? >
PTC's Arbortext (aka Epic) does support XSD. It also supports Schematron validation--though not RelaxNG currently--so one can use a combination of XSD plus Schematron rules to validate ones DocBook content. paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
