Thanks, Bob. That explains it. I was using version 1.73.2 of the stylesheets with my DocBook 4.5 content, but I'm using 1.76.1 now for DocBook 5 content.
Regards, Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Bob Stayton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 2012-03-25 10:10 To: Jeff Powanda; [email protected] Subject: Re: [docbook] Support for PDF fragment identifiers in DocBook 5 Hi Jeff, Did you mention what version of DocBook XSL you are using? The dest= syntax was added in 1.76.1, but did not appear in earlier versions. I just tried it with both versions of 1.76.1, and both produced the dest= syntax. Did you change the XSL version when you went to DocBook 5? Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Powanda" <[email protected]> To: "Bob Stayton" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 4:16 PM Subject: RE: [docbook] Support for PDF fragment identifiers in DocBook 5 I took a look at the same link to an external PDF in separate FO files generated from DocBook 4.5 and DocBook 5.0. In the <fo:basic-link> element, here's what the external-destination attribute looks like in the FO file generated using DocBook 5: external-destination="url(filename.pdf#dest=id)" Here's how the external-destination attribute looks in the FO file generated using DocBook 4.5: external-destination="filename.pdf#id" The only difference in my toolchain is the XSLT processor. For DocBook 4.5, I'm using Saxon 6.5.3. For DocBook 5, I'm using Saxon 6.5.5. Regards, Jeff ________________________________ From: Bob Stayton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 2012-03-24 01:55 To: Jeff Powanda; [email protected] Subject: Re: [docbook] Support for PDF fragment identifiers in DocBook 5 Hi Jeff, There should be no difference between the ns and non-ns stylesheet versions. That behavior is toggled by the stylesheet param 'insert.olink.pdf.frag', which is set to zero by default in both stylesheet versions. Something else must account for the change in behavior. Can you check the .fo files for 4.5 and 5 to see if the #fragment identifiers are present in the FO output? Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Powanda <mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 12:47 PM Subject: [docbook] Support for PDF fragment identifiers in DocBook 5 When I upgraded from DocBook 4.5 to 5, I was pleased to discover that PDF fragment identifiers now work as they should. When I click a link to another PDF, it opens the referenced PDF and jumps to that location. I was surprised at this because I'm using the same version of FOP (a snapshot build of FOP 1.0) that I used with DocBook 4.5. Do the DocBook 5 stylesheets handle fragment identifiers differently than they did in DocBook 4.5? Just trying to understand why this works now. Regards, Jeff Powanda Vocera Communications, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
