Indeed, the versions in SourceForge SVN are not current. I sent a note to Norm asking
him about the status of those files.
In beta 7, the committee implemented their decision to not allow content in an
assembly file, except in a merge element. That simplifies the schemas and avoids
keeping translatable content in a location separate from the resources. So the
"container" versions of resource and module were removed. The description element was
added at the same time.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Schraitle" <[email protected]>
To: "Bob Stayton" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [docbook] Different resource Definitions in Assembly File and
Schema?
Hi Bob,
thanks for your quick answer.
Am Donnerstag, 17. Mai 2012, 08:37:26 schrieb Bob Stayton:
The version of the assembly schema that I included in the XSL snapshots is
assembly51b7.rnc, but that version does not contain any reference to
"db.file.resource", and neither does the schema file downloaded from [2].
So I'm wondering how you ended up with an older version.
Hmn, it seems, I've used version 5.1b6. In 5.1b7 the above patterns are not
available anymore.
Interestingly, the src/assembly-core.rnc in SVN[1] contains still the
db.file.resource and db.container.resource patterns:
$ grep -n "db.resource =" assembly-core.rnc
120: db.resource = db.file.resource | db.container.resource
Can you confirm that?
As far as I can see, the definition has been changed in 5.1b7 and contains now
description. Is that correct?
Thanks! :)
------
[1]
https://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/docbook/trunk/docbook/relaxng/docbook/src/assembly-
core.rnc
--
Gruß/Regards
Thomas Schraitle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
