Hi,
The schema is more up to date than TDG at this point. Use the linkend attribute in
instance.
I should mention that the current version of assembly.xsl in the snapshot DocBook XSL
does not process the relationships element by default. I'm not sure there is a
standard way for handling relationships, so for now you will need to write templates
to implement your expected behavior.
Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Schraitle" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:16 AM
Subject: [docbook] Assemblies: Missing resourceref attribute in instance
element?
Hi,
sorry to bother again. :-] Again the assemblies: According to the latest
assembly schema[1], the instance element is definied as follows:
db.instance.role.attribute = attribute role { text }
db.instance.linking.attribute =
## Specifies the type of link for this instance
attribute linking { xsd:NMTOKENS }
db.instance.attlist =
db.instance.role.attribute?
& db.instance.linking.attribute?
& db.common.attributes
db.instance =
## Identifies a resource that is part of a relationship
element instance {
db.instance.attlist, db.linkend.attribute, empty
}
However, the TDG5.1 gives the following example[2]:
<relationship type="seealso">
<instance resourceref="tut1"/>
<instance resourceref="tut2"/>
<instance resourceref="task1"/>
</relationship>
It seems, there is no resourceref attribute definied for instance. Is this an
omission in the schema, a typo in the TDG, or am I blind? :)
Thanks! :-)
---- References
[1] http://www.docbook.org/xml/5.1b7/rng/assembly.rnc
[2] http://www.docbook.org/tdg51/en/html/ch06.html#relationships
--
Gruß/Regards
Thomas Schraitle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
