Hi,
Actually that page says:

Optionally one of: 
  a.. revdescription
  b.. revremark
So it is either one, but not both.

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
[email protected]


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dominic Weiss 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 2:00 AM
  Subject: [docbook] <revremark> not allowed in <revision>??


  Hi List,

  I have the following xml revhistory/revision:

  <revhistory>

                                <title>Versionsgeschichte</title>

                                 <revision>

                                                 <revnumber>0.0.1</revnumber>

                                                 <date>19.07.2012</date>

                                                 
<authorinitials>DW</authorinitials>

                                                 <revdescription>

                                                                 <itemizedlist>

                                                                                
<listitem><para>Modul1.exe</para></listitem>

                                                                                
<listitem><para>Modul3.exe</para></listitem>

                                                                                
<listitem><para>Modul3.exe</para></listitem>

                                                                 </itemizedlist>

                                                 </revdescription>

                                                 <revremark>ServicePack mit 
Release der 11. Fortschreibung</revremark>

                                 </revision>

                  </revhistory>

   

  The tdg told me that I can use revdescription and revremark in revision 
(http://docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/revision.html)

  The parser (jing) output:

  error: element "revremark" from namespace "http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"; not 
allowed in this context

   

  I'm using db5 with the docbook-xsl-ns-1.76.1 Stylesheets. Can someone please 
tell me whats going wrong here?

   

  Greetings, Dominic

   

   

Reply via email to