Hi Bob,
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:48:21 -0700
"Bob Stayton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think up to now putting a collection of articles in a book was
> considered sufficient. Originally, set was defined as a container
> for multiple books so that xrefs between books could be validated,
> since such links have to be in the same document (ID/IDREF). More
> recently, someone submitted an RFE and made the case for allowing
> nested sets, supplying a use case that made sense to the DocBook TC.
> If you want set to contain article, you could file an RFE on the
> DocBook SourceForge site and present your case. The TC considers all
> RFEs that are submitted.
Thanks Bob, for your suggestion.
I've submitted a RFE ("Allow Article in Set"). You can find it here:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3571149&group_id=21935&atid=384107
--
Gruß/Regards,
Thomas Schraitle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
