"Bob Stayton" <b...@sagehill.net> writes: >> There's an xpath() scheme and it's pretty widely supported, I believe. > > I cannot seem to find any information about the xpath() scheme in > xpointer, except your earlier email mentioning that you implemented it > in Calabash. It is listed on the W3C XPointer Registry, but the > "specification" link goes to the W3C spec for XPath 2.0. I doubt the > xpath() scheme supports the entire XPath 2.0 standard. Do you know > where the scheme originated and who maintains it? And which processors > have implemented it?
I don't believe there's an independent spec for it. If you claim to support
the xpath() scheme, I believe the expectation is that you will support all
of XPath (1 or 2).
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <n...@nwalsh.com> | One must look for one thing only,
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | to find many.--Cesare Pavese
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
pgprKIisdp2Tt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
