Hi all,
I've construed a docbook 5.0 xml document whose structure appears to be
invalid because it holds <equation>'s and <figure>'s as descendants of
an <example>.
- I'm curious about the rationale regarding this being invalid.
- Are there any suggestions for valid alternatives?
Right now, just ignoring that the structure is invalid, doesn't pose a
any problem to processing this document to FO (using xsltproc), and
subsequently to PDF (using FOP). The PDF is nice with equations and
figures in example.
But can I expect problems in the future when ignoring that the structure
is invalid?
Thanks in advance for any insight,
Erik Leunissen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
