On 3.10.2014 18:21, Steve Cuzner wrote: > I'm investigating porting our 4.x docbook to 5.x. For our custom > elements, I'm considering adding them to our own namespace so that it > is more obvious which elements are docbook and which are custom to > our extension. While technically not necessary given that any > customizations makes it not DocBook, what are the pros and cons of > namespacing our own extension elements?
Putting custom elements into a separate namespace will make authoring
much more less convenient. I usually prefer easier authoring over
possible future class of newly introduced standard DocBook element.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: [email protected] http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bringing you XML Prague conference http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
