Stefan Knorr <skn...@suse.de> writes: > To be honest, I still think that allowing (formal|sim)para should be > enough... but I can accept different opinions. At least this is expected > and not a bug.
Yes, probably paras would be enough. Except when someone comes along wanting one other thing. Then one other. By and large, DocBook has abandoned attempts to be prescriptive. Unless there's a good reason, anywhere you can put a block element, you can put any block element, and anywhere you can put an inline, you can put any inline. It's entirely reasonable to limit the elements you allow in a local customization. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <n...@nwalsh.com> | Everything we love, no doubt, will http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | pass away, perhaps tomorrow, Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | perhaps a thousand years hence. | Neither it nor our love for it is | any the less valuable for that | reason.--John Passmore
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature