Stefan Knorr <[email protected]> writes: > To be honest, I still think that allowing (formal|sim)para should be > enough... but I can accept different opinions. At least this is expected > and not a bug.
Yes, probably paras would be enough. Except when someone comes along
wanting one other thing. Then one other. By and large, DocBook has
abandoned attempts to be prescriptive. Unless there's a good reason,
anywhere you can put a block element, you can put any block element,
and anywhere you can put an inline, you can put any inline.
It's entirely reasonable to limit the elements you allow in a local
customization.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <[email protected]> | Everything we love, no doubt, will
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | pass away, perhaps tomorrow,
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | perhaps a thousand years hence.
| Neither it nor our love for it is
| any the less valuable for that
| reason.--John Passmore
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
