Thomas Schraitle <tom_s...@web.de> writes: > Additionally, even if we had a DTD for all versions, this wouldn't work > either. We have several, different schemas: DTD, RNG, SCH, NVDL, and XSD (5.0 > only). So I politely ask, if we could change that to a better term? What > about: > > DocBook V5.x XML Schemas > > Would that work? :) Thanks!
Yes, that makes total sense. I expect the bit of infrastructure that
builds those pages hasn’t been updated since, uh, well, uh, since they
were DTDs! I’ll see what I can do.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Tovey-Walsh <n...@nwalsh.com>
https://nwalsh.com/
> One must not confuse scientific fact with scientific misconception.
> They're more or less opposites, of course. But a scientific
> misconception, if widely believed, creates a kind of truth of its own.
> This doesn't seem to make sense, but it's true.--Adam Felber
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
