a few comments ... Thomas Klausner wrote:
> <flame> > IMO tables shouldn't be used for page layout. They just suck and are a > hopefully soon to be forgotten relict of mid/end 90ies HTML-"programming" > Just to bad that everyone seems to be using tables for what they weren't > inteded (including some HTML generating programs like Frontpage et.al.) > </flame> well i basically agree, but i have _never_ seen a good looking (just slightly complex) site that wasn't using tables. from where i am standing (and i can see one or two customers who wants pretty similar pages cross-browser/platform) i cannot see html-tables going away (design wise) for a long period of time - too bad, but that is just the way i see it right now. Philip Mak wrote: > I think that about 50% of people have 800x600 screens so that 800x600 is > important; see http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2001/December/res.php ... and about 3% use higher res than 1024x768 so why do we bother so much about those - its not like they are unable (or disabled) to actually view our content? ./allan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
