Hi! On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:32:37AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > I disagree to drop the UP link (may be it should be called differently? > "parent"?). This is why: > > The breadcrumb is useful for: > - global navigation > - knowing where you are. > > A quick go to the parent link is very helpful to be in the vicinity of > its children. You have to scroll up for breadcrumb, what if you are > located at the bottom of a very long page? I think this last reason is > the most important. That's true. I did't thought about that.
What I don't like about "UP" is that prev and next aren't labeled "prev" and "next" but with the titles of the corresponding documents. So you have a mixture of lables (named ones and generic) which is sort of iritating. What about using the name of the "UP" document in the widget? Or using literally "prev | up | next" (although I like the idea of knowing what "next" will be) > So may be we should drop the idea having two items in the same nav > widget contrasting each other? And just have something like: > > ------------------------ > [ < Prev | UP | Next > ] > ------------------------ > > We always have 2 or 3 elements so we don't really have to use the > technique used when you have many rows or columns. I don't get you here ... -- D_OMM +----> http://domm.zsi.at <-----+ O_xyderkes | neu: Arbeitsplatz | M_echanen | http://domm.zsi.at/d/d162.html | M_asteuei +--------------------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
