Bill Moseley wrote:
At 10:30 PM 12/30/01 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
IMO (and w3.org's too) tables shouldn't be missused for page layout. The problem with most so called web designers is that they know nothing about how the web work (or how it should work). Just because everyone uses Frontpage et al to generate bloated, bad HTML is no reason for me to do the same.
I don't want to argue about how the web should work. How it should work and how it's used are different things.
Anyway it's a simple issue: Decide as a group what is an acceptable percent of requests that won't be able to view the mod_perl site at this time. Then look at the perl.apache.org logs and see if we are currently above or below that level.
That's all I was pointing out.
There is no need to make group decisions. The mod_perl site should be properly viewable by *all* users using rendering user agents (aka browsers) implemented according to the wide open standards. We aren't a commercial body that decides to cut some users off, because let's say 90% is good enough for their profit making machine.
Do you say that Thomas' design makes it un-readable for someone? I think in the worst case, if the browser doesn't support CSS, the user will get the menu on the top, followed by the content. Am I wrong?
_____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
