Stas Bekman wrote: > The second issue is the css syntax. I read that some browsers don't > understand 'background-image' tag, but do understand 'background'. So > should I provide both? Of course I've kept the 'background-color' in > case the images are disabled.
do you mean understand in a css-way or html-way. most browsers understand the html: <body background="some.gif"> besides for best results i _think_ that this: background-color: #000066; background-image: url(images/bg.jpg); background: url(images/bg.jpg); should be: background-image: url(images/bg.jpg); background: url(images/bg.jpg); background-color: #000066; ./allan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
