Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> allan wrote:
> 
> > with regard to fonts i think we should:
> >
> > - use relative font-sizes
> > (i prefer using ems like 1.0em, 1.5em etc.)
> 
> is it better than using big, small, x-small? I think em is the same as
> PS/PDF syntax.


am not sure but i think so and any typographist (i dont know
the english word) would think em are correct to use ...
maybe the big, small etc was what messed things up on
jonathans view (win2k msie 6)
 
> > - use font-family: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;
> > (i really like verdana, its beautiful and very easy to read
> > (maybe it is also over-used))
> 
> is helvetica bad? I've tuned the guide to use:

its not bad at all, i was just reflecting on my personal
prefrences. verdana has a slightly wider default letter-spacing.

> Also this is the fixed font used:
> 
>    font-family: courier new, courier, monospace;


this is like


./allan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  • Re: fonts allan

Reply via email to