Bill Moseley wrote:
At 10:39 AM 1/29/2002 +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/mp_bg/
Looks nice. (maybe just because it's /not/ the thing I've been staring at the last days ...)
Hey, I like that one. Yes.
Whoah, I like it too!!!
+1
I think this approach solves so many problems! e.g. no need for having a box for a content -- no problem with long <pre> lines.
(Thats why I love CSS. Just change a few lines and the site looks totally
different.
You mean "different" as in "different in each browser?" ;)
:)
Try that with a table-based design!)
Well, there are those things called "templates", you know.
still it's quite a mess to work with heavy html. Though if you look at the splash library that we use a bit. It takes all these worries away.
One note, though: the menu looks bad now, just image it somehow different ...
I actually like it. Maybe because it's because it's a new look.
yeah, may be :0) why do you say it looks bad, Thomas?
Still
think a A:hover couldn't hurt for the menu.
+1
I forget, why isn't there a
Home menu item?
It's not there by design :) I didn't think of having it. Do we really need it? I
_____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
