Stas Bekman wrote: > Nope, because that implies that there are two functions. Every time you > reverse colors in prev|up|next the link goes elsewhere. If you do the > same for the top icon, people will think that the arrow-up is no the > same as the word top.
really? > May be we should simply leave only the word 'top' or the arrow-up. In > fact I think that to be consistent we should either add arrows to the > prev|next widget or remove it from top. No? i dont think so, but i definetely dont like an arrow up inside of the prev-widget as this points to ... top :) > > also as a sitenote, the space above & below should be > > increased even further > > (<br>x3 on both sides i think) > > why? to make a better separation? I agree with separation, but I really > dislike the fact that the more <br>'s you add the more scrolling you > need right away. On the opposite I'd prefer to see as much as possible > content without scrolling at all. May be I can switch to the next page, > without a need to look further down the page. That's why I've added <hr> > to do the separation with minimal vertical space waste. But you > disapproved it, so I've removed it. we disagree on this so you can qoute me for this :) "i'd rather scroll and rest my eyes on whitespace" > OK, how about changing the title widget not to carry a bg, but to make > it outstanding in some other ways. And instead make the [search| > download| prev|next] widget use a different bg color? In this case the > separation will be clear and there will be no need for any <br>'s at all? eh, i was mostly talking about whitespace around top-widget (not prev-widget) if we change the bg-color of the title i think we end up in trouble with the breadcrumb. ./allan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
