Hi! On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:37:09PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > Mabe it's because I did't built PDFs? > have you tried bin/build -df? Once you've built the pdfs they should > always be picked up. If they aren't it's a bug. Is it? I tried, but got some errors from forgotten2pdf (something about hyphe.. file not found?)
> > bgline.jpg - the left area is light yellow. > I've tried it, do you like it better than grey? I feel like it brings > disballance to the site's colormap. IMO, it's better if we use as few > colors as possible. What other folks think? The problem with the grey we are using now is that it contrasts very little with the table headings. So I tried a light yellow, like Allan suggested some time ago for some other area. Maby a lighter/greyer yellow is better, but it's very hard for me to work on colors, because I've only got a laptop with TFT-display at home (which displays colors somewhat different), and I'm not that often in the office (where I have a regular monitor). > Any reason for using jpeg here? I'm not sure if all browsers can handle > this as a bg. For some reason I think I remember reading that bg cannot > be jpeg. Am I wrong? gif is definitly better, but I wasn't able to generate one. > > * in Mozilla, there are no borders around the NavBar tables, whereas with IE > > and Opera, there are. > not on opera/5/linux. How do we solve this? Do we want/need to solve this? I'll take a look if I can get the borders working in Mozilla, because they do look nice. But they aren't absolutly needed, I guess. > > * with Opera and IE, there is too little spacing between the ads. Maybe add > > a br or > Do we really want the spacing? sure we can add. It's not so much a spacing problem but a border problem, see attached screenshot. > > * there are empty prev/up/next boxes on the main page, looking sort of > > strange. I'd say we remove those completly, if there is no UP > 2. change the page_no*gif to be completely transparent, so when one of > the pages is not there, the user won't see any image at all. Though I do +1 the empty boxes look a little bit strange, if you don't know what they are there for (and you cannot know that if you look at the page the first time, starting with the first page.) So I'd say we use invisble images when there is nothing to display. > want to use a placeholder so the other elements in this widget and the > whole [search|download|nav] widget won't move left<=>right. I think to > do the same solution for the download widget, though it's harder because > it moves anyway since the download sizes vary (1k vs 100k). The latter > can be solved by always using the same width for the size. But since the > font is variable the rendered size will still change. Shell we use > <code></code> to solve this? We could put the SRC and the PDF links each in a td of its own. They won't move (much) then. -- D_OMM +----> http://domm.zsi.at <-----+ O_xyderkes | neu: Arbeitsplatz | M_echanen | http://domm.zsi.at/d/d162.html | M_asteuei +--------------------------------+
<<attachment: ad.jpg>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
