Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
At 12:06 15.04.2002, allan wrote:
hi
having looked at the various solutions/suggestions i suggest this, if we can do it:
see attached gif.
* the previous "Top"-image is now called "Toc" and links to the relevant section in the table of contents * the "Top" image is now blue [it could be vice versa of course] and links of course to the top. * the numbers link upwards to parents and parents parents etc etc..
I don't like this approach. This links to an immidiate parent and doesn't give me the whole map. A quick jump to the TOC gives you a much better map.
* the headers h* are all the same size and font specs [this is only because it is very clear how deep you are -> so no point in eleborating further on the sizes]
I would still be inclined to have a size difference, as it's what is "normal".
ok, maybe i'm looking at it the wrong way. so please correct me if i am wrong. as it is now i have seen up to 4 nested level, spanning from h1, h2, h3, h4. can we assure that we wont have one ore more further levels? if so, i can easily live with the h1-h4 solution. but what if we have, say two more levels. would we then go from h1-h6? and what relative sizes should those then be? it's not that i am against this, i just fail to see any real gain [maybe h1=big, h>1=less big]
Most likely h4 is the limit.
+ there is no link/hovering on the actual header-title. i think a link on an actual header is a crime :)
Since when?
+ but we maintain navigation to parents while maintaining exact navigation to the table of contents.
I'm -1 on this mechanism.
I'm not sure about the numbers. There is little added value about them. Other than helping to know that a certain item has some siblings before it if its number is more then 1.
Please let's not mix the printed documents with online ones. Printed docs don't change, therefore it makes sense to number the sections. Online docs change, new sections get added and other removed. Things move around. Some people always going to an item 1.5.7 will get used to this number and start referring to it on the list and in their head. One day this number won't refer to the same item anymore, because things will change. Oops.
Based on the above logic I'm -1 on adding numbers. __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
