At 12:42 PM 04/18/02 +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: >> - Need a better "go" button, and a little less tall. Who's handy in The >> Gimp/Photoshop? > >First let's decide do we want Search => Go, or just Search as a submit >button?
I just had a hard time getting a real button to fit in and look close to the same in different clients. >> BTW -- does anyone else think that the Prev|Next images are a bit big or >> over powering? What about http://hank.org:5000/test1/docs/index.html? > >-0, I think it's good for them to stand out, I believe the thin margin >is good. May be what makes certain buttons overpowering is the strong >bg. What if use a lighter bg similar to the bg of the left box with >menus? For buttons and the title? Really as I look at it now, it's the [SRC] button that stands out. I liked it better when I first looked at it than now a few hours later. But I also tend to like a lot of white space. It's an optical illusion - if the [SRC] is by itself then it looks big, but if I resize my window smaller to force [SRC] next to [Next] then it's no so big. Maybe SRC doesn't need to be all caps. >we have an empty space anyway, and it's a useful feel. What if I prefer >to read the PDFs and not HTML, that way I'll have to scroll down all the >time... think of long pages. We can definitely have them in both places. Ok. I'd think that PDF people would be printing, but you never know. >There is another problem: When you go deeper than the subgroup listed in >options, you cannot search only it. i.e. the concept of 'This section' >is gone. So may be we keep the Whole site/ This section only options? True, but I wouldn't worry about that. I don't think it needs to be that fine grain. Thanks, -- Bill Moseley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
