i have fix for that i hope ... coming to a screen near you soon :) Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > > At 19:20 24.04.2002, allan wrote: > >Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > > Bill Moseley wrote: > > > > Seems like we should have just a few link styles. I personally like > > things > > > > like menus, TOCs and obvious links without underlines, but with a hover > > > > that underlines. Regardless, I think hover should make links more > > obvious > > > > and not fade away. > > > >i agree with bill that we have too many styles at the > >moment. i also think that fading on hover is somewhat > >counter-intuitive, but i don't really consider this a > >problem currently. > > One thing that annoys me is that on many pages, you get a mix of underlined > and non/underlines styles. For example, in <li> elements, you'll get > non-underlined links, while outside them they're underlined. This is a bug > I think. > > -- > Per Einar Ellefsen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
