Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
At 06:03 11.06.2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm afraid there will be too little interest and we may end up with
unacceptable logos which "win" just because there are no others.
Therefore we need to set a treshold to first reject those that we
don't like. After that the same group that works on the site can
judge if we select only a few (but I doubt we will have too many).
Yes, clearly. But instead of rejecting completely it would be more
appropriate to work *with* the designers and guide them if they're
off track.
if there is an interest sure
How should we go about with this? Write up the rules, submit it to
the list, and wait?
Yup, need to prepare a proposal, discuss it here, post to the list, ...
Great!
I'll prepare the proposal today and send it here.
We need a deadline.
True, 3 weeks?
Whatever we do, there's the risk of me leaving for vacation before
everything is done. I'm leaving the 5th of July. But anyway, that
shouldn't be a consideration.
Good for you :)
If we start this now, we have about 3 weeks anyways. e.g. make it July 1st.
when do you come back?
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
