Quoting Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > allan juul wrote: > > Quoting Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > >>the new button is next to the [^top] button. > > > > > > it will look ok by me, though i prefer the top-button to be seperated > simply > > because of its nature - it links to the top of the page whereas the changes > > > links to a completely diferent page/file. does the changes belong to a > ceratin > > section of a page, like IV Troubleshooting or does it refer to the page as > a > > whole? > > > > what about a link in the vein of the "more>>"-links on > > http://perl.apache.org/release/start/index.html > > It belongs to the whole docset, so the above style won't work. What if > the 'changes' button moved to the left of [prev|next]? or put into the > center?
center prefered. if it was moved next to [prev|next] it would a) spoil the 3- some harmony of that widget and b) have to be at the top [prev|next]-widget as well. why does it have to be a 'button'? ./allan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
