At 02:17 PM 07/01/02 +0100, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote: >> The truncating idea could work. Though we need to think about the >> details: do we truncate the last element? and what if the previous >> element was too long? not simple, eh? if you know how, please go all the >> way down rather just saying that this is wrong. we do know that this is >> "wrong" but we don't know "better". > >Okay. Truncating could be performed by a number of methods:
I was not suggesting that they be any longer, but that they just show the current page as a NON-link that is now shown as a link when you go one more level deep. I assume that we will always have to truncate the level of the bread crumb at some nested level. So the difference is that http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/1.0/guide/index.html shows the same bread crumb as http://perl.apache.org/release/docs/1.0/guide/getwet.html but the first doesn't have mod_perl 1.0 User Guide as a link. Basically, I was thinking the bread crumb should end with at least the current major section, sometimes as a link, sometimes not if deeper within that section. Adding "Getting Your Feet Wet" as a non-link on getwet.html would make it complete, but not what I was thinking, and then that would be quite wide. I agree we should be "standard", but I also think users of the mod_perl site can figure out the bread crumb. -- Bill Moseley mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
