On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 10:13:58PM +0200, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > At 22:03 24.10.2002, allan wrote: > >why not the eagle book [ it's the last ] ? > > Yeah, but also the most important one. But it's probably more fair to have > the last one removed.
I think the Eagle is the most important one too, but how about some kind of cycling mechanism so all books get exposure?
Yes, good idea. I'll re-work the templates a little now and try to get that one working nicely.
-- Per Einar Ellefsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
