On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > Bill, should we upgrade the binary on daedalus as well? I'm not > symlinking to your copy. I use a real copy. Or should we leave things as is?
http://www.swish-e.org/current/docs/CHANGES.html doesn't show anything that effects what we are doing. Might as well wait for 2.4 I would have thought that HTMLLinksMetaName was in our version, but I'd have to look at the cvs to see when that was added. In cvs swish.cgi can use the swish-e library and also has a feature suggested by Brian B. to run /bin/ps and not run swish-e if there's too many running already. search.apache.org was getting hit hard and there were a bunch of swish-e processes using up resources. My tests showed that running the script under mod_perl with max_clients set only to two was a better solution that running /bin/ps ;) It might be helpful if search.apache.org wasn't listed as an example the flood docs! Hey, is there any reason to have search.apache.org index perl.apache.org? I'm indexing almost 80,000 files (Jakarta has 10,000 dirs) and it generates a 200M index file so any reduction would be nice. -- Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
