On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>>randyk 2004/07/14 12:13:59
> >>>
> >>> Modified: src/docs/1.0/os/win32 distinstall
> >>> src/docs/2.0/os/win32 distinstall
> >>> Log:
> >>> bump up version of available Perl-5.8.x/Apache-2.0.x Win32
> >>> binary distribution.
> >>[...]
> >>> -1. Perl 5.8.2 / Apache 2.0.48 / mod_perl 1.99
> >>> +1. Perl 5.8.4 / Apache 2.0.50 / mod_perl 1.99
> >>> 2. Perl 5.6.1 / Apache 1.3.27 / mod_perl 1.27
> >>
> >>any reason why it doesn't specify the real version number? i.e. 1.99_14
> >>or so?
> >
> >
> > Good idea, especially for mp2, being in development. I'll
> > add that. Thanks.
>
> Great. But it's not 1.99_15. It's 1.99_15-dev.
>
> -1. Perl 5.8.4 / Apache 2.0.50 / mod_perl 1.99
> +1. Perl 5.8.4 / Apache 2.0.50 / mod_perl 1.99_15
Maybe I'm confused on the versioning system ... Within the
current mp2 cvs:
$ pwd
/home/randy/modperl-2.0
$ grep VERSION lib/mod_perl.pm
our $VERSION = "1.9915";
I know it's in '-dev'elopment, but I thought if I added
'-dev' to the docs, it might cause confusion if someone
checked the installed version and it didn't match. Of
course, saying it's "1.99_15" is also confusing, as _15
isn't on CPAN ...
--
best regards,
randy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
