On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, David Wheeler wrote:
Hi All,
I'm reading through testing/testing.pod right now, making some changes to make its narrative flow a bit better, plus changing the occasional grammatical or spelling error (patch to follow). A quick question, though: Does the POD processing module that the project use recognize the F<> POD tag? This tag identifies files. Right now, the docs are using I<> for files, but F<> is more correct. If the POD processing that generates the HTML and other formats recognizes F<>, I'd like to switch to it.
Thanks,
David
Yes, F<> is understood (I've been using it for the Win32 sections). There's a neat feature in the html conversion - if there's a (physical) file "foo", F<foo> will become a link to "foo".
Right, and that's why I mostly used F<> where there was a real file to link to. But feel free to fix those. AFAIK, pod renderers don't make any difference between F<> and I<>. Or had it changed recently?
-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
