Frank Wiles wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:09:45 -0500 Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
Yeah, it sucks++ and it's a major issue I have with https+svn. ButWhy is it worse?
it's only going to get worste
once we move over to ssl client certificate authentication ... The
only thing needed is the same
thing as ssh-agent, but for ssl keys.
I'm surprised they want to use https+svn since I've found ssh+svn to
be much faster and less resource intensive on the box.
That's indeed the case.
Bingo! Right on. I was talking to infra folks and they are looking into the future and administeringI'm sure however that the administration of https+svn is probably
less than ssh+svn since it doesn't require Unix users, keys, etc.
1000+ unix users with shell accounts is much much more complex than if these 1000 accounts are
all confined within the realm of a htaccess file ;-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
