Bill McGonigle wrote:
Where exactly mod_perl kicks in here? I've
searched the site and there is not a single mentioning of mod_perl. And
the very first hit of maillist search gave me this:
http://www.icdevgroup.org/pipermail/interchange-users/2001-January/003879.html



Hmm, that's a bit of an old link.  This one is probably most instructive:
  
http://www.icdevgroup.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/interchange/dist/src/mod_perl2/README?rev=1.2&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup

I originally wrote up the patch based on a friend telling me he was
running it under mod_perl (I'm not actually a user myself).  This page
seems to indicate that only a part of the server is running under
mod_perl2, a conduit to marshal requests to an Interchange process
listening on a socket (which is apparently how many people run it).

So I'm not sure if that qualifies for inclusion in the page.  The whole
thing isn't based on mod_perl, like e.g. Mason.  Your call.

We just want to keep that page limited to stuff that runs under mod_perl, as you've now shown that it does, it was committed (will show up within 6 hours). Thanks Bill.



-- __________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to