On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:51:03AM -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> It's been a while, but I think it's true that the indexes are not >> portable between 64 and 32 bit machines. > Both are 64bit. amd64 vs sparc64
Well, the indexes should be portable between them, but it would not surprise me if there were differences in the two compilers so that the indexes get written differently -- not a lot of testing was done on 64bit platforms. The "portability" of the swish indexes is just that items are written in network order. But, swish still uses the native sizes on the platform in use. >> What about moving to Google for the search feature? > This is what infrastructure would actually prefer. Take a gander at the way > it works > on httpd.apache.org. > > My only concern here is that you loose all th wonderful formating and > styling...... > > But Feh, theres a chance google might do it better? > [nothing against you bill] Nobody confuses Swish with Google. I think Google would be the easiest approach. -- Bill Moseley [email protected] Sent from my iMutt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
