Rainer Heilke wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> >Rainer Heilke wrote:
> >>I agree with the original contributor that XML is not a suitable path.
> >
> >Erm... "XML" would only be the "encoding" (like original HTML used
> >"SGML" until it got messed-up by suers relying on "relaxed-syntax"
> >parsers). The idea was to use DocBook which isn't more difficult to
> >learn than HTML or the MediaWiki syntax and in many cases it's much more
> >"effective" (except that you can't abuse tables for layout anymore
> >etc.).
> >
> OK, correction accepted. However, DocBook still introduces either new
> tools or a learning curve to learn the new markup language. Let's not
> lose sight of what this FAQ is nor it's intended audience. I strongly
> doubt it will force a need for much more than text or simple tables. I
> may end up being proved wrong somewhere down the line, but I'm doubtful.

Right... but somehow I wish (e.g. general wish... I could even extend
this to the rant that the whole "DocBook in Solaris"-thing feels like
another "MAJC" (e.g. great concept/product, bad marketing, noone used it
and in the result it was a failure) - lots of money was invested but 90%
inside and outside Sun/OpenSolaris.org uses the old stuff (for
example... why are the manual pages still converted from SolBook to
troff to plain text ? Grumpf... ;-( )) DocBook would be used more often
for documentation within Solaris and OpenSolaris.org.

> >What about running a background script every hour if the Wiki was
> >updated ?
> >
> Whether every hour, or with each update, or whatever, it still requires
> scripting, server resources, etc. I'm not going to make assumptions
> about the server or it's load, the probable need to install new
> software, the admins' workload, etc. etc.

Right (and the Tonic team is already understaffed and giving a server
ssh login away to other people may be tricky, too) ... ;-/

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)

Reply via email to