G'Day Ben, On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Ben Rockwood wrote:
> I vote for an SCM, which means it would be implemented with the code SCM > whenever that happens. I'm not sure what you use to write your docs > Brendan, but mine are done in LaTeX and DocBook making an SCM the prime > way to go about it. I manage all my docs and the docs for Enlightenment > this way. If you then want automation to a public locale, assuming you > don't just link to a web viable SCM interface (CVS-Web or Subversion) > you can dump the doc into the final location. Yes - I agree with having an SCM (+1). I'm currently writing in HTML with my own versioning software - yeah, I should stop that. :) It seems that subversion is being adopted more often these days - so maybe that is the way to go. It's on my todo list to move all my stuff into subversion. > Just out of curiousity, whats wrong with the file upload section of the > web interface we currently have? Your a docs community leader, so you > have upload permissions. That's the exact problem - I shouldn't need to be a community leader to upload files, else we may end up with a hundred or so community leaders (if we are lucky :). Brendan
