On 4/1/06, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > :Lets look at it another way. > : > :"It is not necessary to enter a spl() level or critical section to > :preserve token atomicity." That sentence is implying that there is an > :spl level in the kernel (which does not exist), as well as implying > :that there is a critical section in the kernel (which does exist). > :Should that sentence be changed to "It is not necessary to enter a > :critical section to preserve token atomicity." since spl's no longer > :exist and critical sections do exist still? > : > :Trevor > > I desparately have to rewrite all that stuff, but it will be a few > weeks. I have to stabilize HEAD and get MFS working again. A bunch > of unexpected issues have popped up. > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
Should I leave the goals.cgi changes in the patch then? They are all spelling fixes. Trevor
