On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > To run with that thought... I had suggested probably 2 years ago we use a > wiki instead of docbook, and while the idea was shot down then, I'm > thinking that wikis are common enough now that it's becoming just as > capable a tool. > > The hassle of both understanding docbook/SGML and having the extensive > toolchain working on a DragonFly system has worked out so that there's > been almost no updates to the Handbook. It's significantly more complex > to maintain than a wiki with no immediate benefit at this point, in my > opinion.
and ... On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Matthew Dillon wrote: > My thinking has changed from 2 years ago as well. It is > pretty clear to me that Wiki is the future for handbook-style > documentation. Okay. What is http://wiki.dragonflybsd.org/index.cgi/DragonFlyBSD_Handbook ? Looks like someone (re)started it. But links go no where. http://wiki.dragonflybsd.org/index.cgi/DragonFlyBSD_Handbook?action=info Jeremy C. Reed
