On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Joshua Slive wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Acked. The remark about a contact point on each page sounds > > more than reasonable -- but we'd either have to deal with spam, > > a Web form, or someone moderating all the crap that came through. > > What would *really* rock would be an interactive annotation > > feature such as PHP uses on their docs.. let people comment, > > and every so often integrate the remarks and clear the annotation > > list. > > Fixed. (It was actually a botched internal link. I forgot the "#".) > > Your idea is great, but I don't think we have the infrastructure to > implement it.
I have become very fond of Wiki over the last several months. It is easy to install, and allows folks to add annotation to documents very simply. See http://www.wikipedia.com/ for an excellent example of a wiki in action. > I think the "recommended" way to comment on this stuff is via the bug > database. I could perhaps put a note to that effect on the docs-project > page. Perhaps it's the name that is off-putting. When it comes to the documentation, folks don't think of it as bugs. It's suggestions, recoomendations, typos, whatever, but not really bugs. -- Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rcbowen.com/kenya/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
