On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Joshua Slive wrote: > > Wish that it was only a problem for Windows users. Since most browsers use > > the extension for as well, you wouldn't be able to transform the file > > directly, ie mozilla file://mod_this_or_that.xml. > I hadn't considered that. Hmmmm.... Actually, I think you are wrong in > general. If the browser is accessing the file through the webserver, it > should be using the Content-Type delivered by the webserver.
I agree, when accessing through a webserver they should use the mime type, but... > Accessing through the filesystem is another story. ...that's what I meant (and hence the example with a file:// URL). I guess I didn't express myself clearly. -- .---------------------. | Patrik Grip-Jansson | | Ringen 4B | .--------------------. | 78444 Borl�nge .--'----' http://gnulix.com/ `---------. | Sweden | All views and opinions are my own, | `------------------| PH:+46(0)24382823 PW:+46(0)707354360 | `--------------------------------------' --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
