> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Unless it really needs to be EMphasised, <i> is a better choice.

Yah, I screwed up a while back when I normalied what is now the <syntax>.  I
used <em> for things that are replaced, whereas I probably should have used
<i>.  Now, with the xml, they should all be changed to <replaceable> or
something, but that was just too much work for me, so I left them.

Of course, it should be simple enough with xml transformations to substitute
tags, provided the context is clear.

Joshua.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to