On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:17:32PM -0400, Rich Bowen wrote:
What is the general consensus regarding 1.3 docs and keeping them up to
date with patches applied to the 2.0 docs?
Personally, I'd treat the 1.3 docs as closed as the 1.3 source tree (i.e. no major changes, just minor problems that are worth us fixing and that more than one person cares about). For instance, if someone wants to do a new translation, they'd be far better off doing it against the 2.0 docs rather than the 1.3 docs.
If you want to resync 1.3 against 2.0, I wouldn't stop you. But, I'd think everyone's time would be better of focusing on the quality of the 2.0 documentation. -- justin
+1. The way I am handling it right now is to only correct errors in the 1.3 docs. Improvements to the documentation I commit only to 2.0. Certainly there are still tons of people using the 1.3 docs, so it would not be a bad idea for someone to back-port changes into 1.3. It is just not something that I feel like doing.
Joshua.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
