* Joshua Slive wrote:
> I'm really trying to avoid any kind of complex formatting in the
> directive definitions (except in <usage>, of course), because that will
> make it easier to reuse this information in other formats.
ok, that makes sense.
> Instead, I've just added a sentence to the <usage> info. It's still not
> incredibly clear, but it is more accurate.
Little mistake there ;-) I think you meant LogFormat instead of
TransferLog.
nd
--
sub the($){+shift} sub answer (){ord q
[* It is always 42! *] }
print the answer
# Andr� Malo # http://www.perlig.de/ #
Index: mod_log_config.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/docs/manual/mod/mod_log_config.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 mod_log_config.xml
--- mod_log_config.xml 23 Aug 2002 15:29:21 -0000 1.7
+++ mod_log_config.xml 24 Aug 2002 00:27:49 -0000
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@
nickname, it doesn't actually apply the format and make it the
default. Therefore, it will not affect subsequent
<directive>TransferLog</directive> directives. In addition,
- <directive>TransferLog</directive> cannot use one nickname
+ <directive>LogFormat</directive> cannot use one nickname
to define another nickname.</p>
<p>For example:</p>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
