* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> > > 1. Why not wipe-out all the underlines? They certainly don't do >> > > any good on paper and they do make the reading harder. >> > >> > That's probably true :-) >> >> On the other hand, the underline states that there is some >> reference on >>the underlined topic. To someone checking the docs for the first time >>or someone not familiar with Apache, this could be good. > > For terms and definitions in the directive blocks??? please... hover > works.
on paper? ;-) hehe, the discussion becomes a bit confusing... However, underlining is [on paper] not the usual way to show that there's a reference. I played around with some arrows before the links, but the browser support for that is bad. I would leave it not underlined for better readablity. > Just a side note... it's amazing how my 10 and 13 year old have no > problem discovering completely un demarcated links where no adult > would ever think to click :-) Some differentiation is required for us > 'old folks' ;-) ;-) nd -- If God intended people to be naked, they would be born that way. -- Oscar Wilde --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
