Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Andr� Malo wrote: >> * Tim Gerundt wrote: >> >> >>>I have a little suggestion for "/docs-2.0/mod/index.xml". >>>In the documentation you use this "red" links for module links. >>>I think at the module overview you should use this style, too. >> >> >> folks, just wanna say, that Tim and me have already discussed that >> before. I suggested him to ask on the list. >> >> My opinion is to stick with the current variant, because I think the >> red highlighting breaks the flow a bit - but I'm unsure. >> Would be nice, if someone could say something; it would only be a >> small patch. >> >> nd > > I don't like this idea. To get it really consistent we would also have > to use the same font (courier, <code>) and that definitely wouldn't > fit in there. Also the semantics are not the same: in continuous text > the module-color/-font has the effect of highlighting the different > link-types (directive, modules, ...) and to make it easier to > differentiate them. In the module overview we have a list with > different modules (headlines), nothing more; there is no need to > differentiate. > > Apart from this i'm +1 on using red-/courier-links in the continuous > text which follows the headlines (see obsolete modules). > I agree with Erik. Kess --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
