* Joshua Slive wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Andr� Malo wrote:
>> Yes! should we introduce a new attribute "createanchor" (="no" in that
>> case; "yes" would be default) or something?
>
> I would lean towards no. A <module> should always have a corresponding
> documentation file. The <module> tag is sort of our contract with the
> user that there is more stuff behind it.
hmm. I mainly thought about sentences like "blah, this is a replacement for
the old <?>mod_mmap_static</?> module". I'm not sure, what to do there.
Semantically these are (or were...) modules. Perhaps we should create an
attribute 'extern="URL"' for such cases or so?
nd
--
Treat your password like your toothbrush. Don't let anybody else
use it, and get a new one every six months. -- Clifford Stoll
(found in ssl_engine_pphrase.c)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
