On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Andr� Malo wrote: > the attached documents introduce explicit documentation of mod_dav_fs. > any comments and/or suggestions before committing?
Looks good. My only suggestion is to be EXTREMELY explicit that mod_dav_fs REQUIRES mod_dav. Just saying it is a "support" module is probably not explicit enough. > DavLockDB is actually defined in mod_dav_fs, but I left a reference in > mod_dav. Is this correct or rather confusing for the user? > > Is there's a rule, when to leave an external reference to a directive in a > module? I'd use a <seealso> rather than a <directivesynopisis location=...>. The latter is really only intended for directives that are implemented by more than one module. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
