On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Mads Toftum wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 06:36:20PM +0100, Astrid Kessler wrote: > > With the documentation for 2.1 we have to clarify the basis for new > > features, upgrading and other documentation stuff explaining differeces > > from previous versions. Is this version 1.3 or is this version 2.0?. For > > example, do we describe new features compared with version 1.3 or do we > > describe new features compared version 2.0? This question will occure many > > times within the whole documentation. > > > I suppose the 2.1 changes page should include what is on the 2.0 page plus > a new since 2.0 section. That section can then be used as a base for the > page once 2.2 is released. For the individual directives the Compatibility > section should be fine.
I disagree. I think we should start fresh with 2.1 changes. A link to the 2.0 version would be plenty for people jumping versions. Joshua.
