On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 04:55:33PM +0100, Andr? Malo wrote:
> * Francis Daly wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 01:09:47PM +0100, Andr? Malo wrote:
> >> So what can we do? AFAICS, the "right" way to handle that automatically
> >> would be including "en" into the accept-string.
> >
> > Actually, rfc-wise, that's the *wrong* thing to do. Best case, you
> > might be able to assume "en" as the lowest-priority thing in the
> > accept-string, but his "fr;q=0.5" would still overrule it.
>
> <snip>
>
> > Really and truly, the only way for this work work is for the user to
> > configure their client properly.
>
> ah, seems to be a misunderstanding. That's what I meant with my statement
> above ;-)
Oh, sorry, yes, now that I read your mail again, I can see what you
meant.
(I took "automatically" to mean "dwim on the server", initially. Hence
my confusion.)
f
--
Francis Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
