On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Astrid Kessler wrote: > > Would anyone object if I change the "TransferLog" directive in ssl.conf > > to a CustomLog directive? > > +1 to change this. > > I'm also wondering why we do not mark the TransferLog directive as > deprecated and remove them in a later release 2.2 or 2.4 or so. In my eyes > it's only a short form of CustomLog which is easy to use but not really > neccessary and may confuse the user. Or do I miss something?
My changes to the docs, are, as always, purely selfish. I don't like having to explain things in class if I don't have to. ;-) But, seriously ... I always had the impression that the TransferLog was purely for backward compatibility with NCSA. I can't say I particularly mind having it around, but I would like to have the default configuration files reflect *recommended* configuration, not merely a functional one. -- Nothing is perfekt. Certainly not me. Success to failure. Just a matter of degrees.
