> >> I've wrapped xml/html around the license to get a rid of the ugly >> text/plain ;-). I'm wondering if this would cause problems. Any Opinions? > >> uploaded the result here: <http://cvs.apache.org/~nd/manual/license.html> > > I'm not sure, whether this document is less ugly :-)
hmm...hehe :) > The licence is not very capable to be transformed into html, but we need > a xml-version as basis for other transformations, e.g. when generating > pdf docs or so, or we may miss the licence there which is much "uglier". +1 > If we need a text-only version for legal reasons (don't know), we should > keep one seperate and add a note with a link at the html version. For the text-only license we should use http://apache.org/LICENSE, IMO. It's always there and always up-to-date... I don't think we need one extra in the docs tree. There is already the LICENSE file in the root directory and this should be sufficient. > Kess Cheers, Erik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
