Hi Joshua,
> Given that, can anyone see a reason not to restrict includes > processing on httpd.apache.org to the /docs/ directory > (the 1.3 docs)? This should reduce server load and speed up > actual and perceived performance due to much better caching. I don't actually see the link between caching efficiency and using SSI in this case (while I agree with you about the server load issue, although I use a separate file name extension for my SSI documents and their number is rather small anyway). I am using SSI in a rather similar way (in my case mainly to reduce the number of HTTP requests by including tiny CSS and JS files and the like - there are too many small updates by too many people to generate the whole tree as static documents), but I am actively sending "Expires:", "Cache-Control" and "Last-Modified" HTTP headers for these pages so that the UserAgent is free to cache them (if not configured too badly). If I'm not mistaken, then this is what "XBitHack full" was just made for? Regards, Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
